{"idNumber":"F23-106441","name":"Good Life Senior Living Price","address":{"suggestedAddress":null,"id":null,"addressOne":"1025 West 470 North","addressTwo":"","city":"Price","state":"UT","zipCode":"84501","county":null,"addressString":" 1025 West 470 North Price, UT 84501","valid":true},"phone":"4356364483","type":null,"licenseType":"Assisted Living Facility - Type II","capacity":16,"underAgeTwoCapacity":0,"initialRegulationDate":"2007-07-20","expirationDate":"2028-09-30","conditional":false,"condExpirationDate":null,"status":"REGULATED","occQiReq":null,"licenseTypes":[{"name":"Assisted Living Facility - Type II","licenseExpirationDate":"2028-09-30","status":null,"totalCapacity":16,"underAgeTwoCapacity":0}],"inspections":[{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2026-08-24","inspectionTypes":"Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2026-07-21","inspectionTypes":"Follow-Up Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[{"ruleId":30328,"ruleNumber":"R380-600-4(1)(a)-(e)","ruleDescription":"Amending an existing license","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"Low","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2026-08-24","cmpAmount":null,"warnCmpAmount":100.0,"correctionAction":"On August 24, 2026, the licensor verified that the administrator ensured that an existing license was amended 30 days prior to a change in administrator, as stated in rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The licensee was out of compliance with R432-380-600-4(1)(c)(i) by not ensuring the provider had submitted a complete program change application to amend an existing license at least 30 days before a change in administrator.  During the inspection, it was discovered that the provider did not submit a program change appllication to amend their existing license at least 30 days before a change in administrator.\n\nThis non-compliance was previously cited on January 28, 2026.  In addition, technical assistance was provided with this rule on June 1, 2026.","underAppeal":false},{"ruleId":32818,"ruleNumber":"R432-270-6(3)(a)-(c)","ruleDescription":"Type II administrator","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"Low","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2026-08-24","cmpAmount":null,"warnCmpAmount":100.0,"correctionAction":"On August 24, 2026, the licensor verified that the licensee ensured that the type II administrator met the qualifications to be the administrator, as stated in rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-6(3)(a) by not ensuring the administrator of a type II small assisted living facility had an associates degree in a health care field.  During the inspection, it was discovered that the facility's current administrator did not have an associates degree in a health care field.\n\nThis non-compliance was previously cited on January 28, 2026.  In addition, technical assistance was provided with this rule on June 1, 2026.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2026-06-01","inspectionTypes":"Unannounced, Annual Inspection","checklistIds":[1055373],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2024-07-15","inspectionTypes":"Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection, Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2024-06-25","inspectionTypes":"Follow-Up Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[{"ruleId":23416,"ruleNumber":"R432-35-4(2)(a)-(b)","ruleDescription":"Cover individual signed background check  form and fingerprints","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"Low","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2024-07-15","cmpAmount":100.0,"warnCmpAmount":100.0,"correctionAction":"On 7/15/2024, the licensor verified that all employees submitted fingerprints, as stated in rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that covered individuals submitted fingerprints within 15 working days of their engagement. During the inspection, employee data in the Direct Access Clearance system was reviewed. One employees’ status was pending, due fingerprints not being completed. \n\nThis non-compliance was previously cited during the complaint inspection conducted on 1/8/2024 and the re-licensure inspection conducted on 5/7/2024.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2024-05-07","inspectionTypes":"Unannounced, Annual Inspection","checklistIds":[595563],"findings":[{"ruleId":24729,"ruleNumber":"R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)","ruleDescription":"Administrator Duties","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2024-06-25","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On 6/25/2024, the licensor verified that all allegations of abuse, neglect and/or exploitation were investigated by the facility, as stated in rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring the administrator fulfilled their duties as outlined in regulations.  During the inspection, it was determined that the administrator admitted and retained a resident who did not meet admission criteria.","underAppeal":false},{"ruleId":24729,"ruleNumber":"R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)","ruleDescription":"Administrator Duties","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2024-06-25","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On 6/25/2024, the licensor verified that the administrator admitted only those residents who met admission criteria, as stated in rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not completing an investigation when there was reason to believe a resident had been subjected to abuse or neglect. During the inspection, incident reports and grievances were reviewed, several grievances, all reported at the same time, indicated that a resident may have been subjected to abuse by a staff member.","underAppeal":false},{"ruleId":24801,"ruleNumber":"R432-270-16(1)","ruleDescription":"Type II Secure Units","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2024-06-25","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On 6/25/2024, the licensor verified that the licensee was actively working to ensure the facility met requirements to be a secure building, as stated in rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring the licensee had secure unit beds before admitting a resident who required a secure unit.  During the inspection, it was discovered that the facility was operating as a secured unit, due to a resident who wandered, and did not have approved secure unit beds.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false}],"dcount":0,"icount":0,"ccount":0,"specialties":null,"cmsCertNumber":null}