{"idNumber":"F23-106851","name":"Spring Gardens Oquirrh Mountain","address":{"suggestedAddress":null,"id":null,"addressOne":"5524 West 6200 South","addressTwo":"","city":"Kearns","state":"UT","zipCode":"84118","county":null,"addressString":" 5524 West 6200 South Kearns, UT 84118","valid":true},"phone":"8018404600","type":null,"licenseType":"Assisted Living Facility - Type II","capacity":117,"underAgeTwoCapacity":36,"initialRegulationDate":"2016-05-24","expirationDate":"2028-01-31","conditional":false,"condExpirationDate":null,"status":"REGULATED","occQiReq":null,"licenseTypes":[{"name":"Assisted Living Facility - Type II","licenseExpirationDate":"2028-01-31","status":null,"totalCapacity":117,"underAgeTwoCapacity":36}],"inspections":[{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2025-12-09","inspectionTypes":"Follow-Up Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2025-11-03","inspectionTypes":"Complaint, Investigation Inspection, Unannounced, Annual Inspection","checklistIds":[745699],"findings":[{"ruleId":30910,"ruleNumber":"R432-270-24(5)(a)-(b)","ruleDescription":"Hot water temperatures","complaintDates":"10/22/2025","findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2025-11-03","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On November 3, 2025, the licensor verified that hot water temperatures were maintained between 105 and 120 degrees Fahrenheit, as stated in rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-24(5)(a)(b) by not ensuring that hot water temperature controls automatically regulated temperatures of hot water delivered to any plumbing fixture used by a resident. The licensee did not ensure hot water delivered to public and resident care areas was maintained at temperatures between 105 and 120 degrees Fahrenheit. During the inspection, the licensor observed hot water temperatures in resident care areas to exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2025-04-30","inspectionTypes":"Investigation Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2025-03-28","inspectionTypes":"Follow-Up Inspection, Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2025-03-14","inspectionTypes":"Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[{"ruleId":25534,"ruleNumber":"R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d)","ruleDescription":"Critical incidents reporting requirements","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"Moderate","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2025-03-28","cmpAmount":null,"warnCmpAmount":150.0,"correctionAction":"On 03/28/2025, this Licensor II verified that the Licensee came into compliance by submitting critical incidents to the Office of Licensing within one business day, as required by rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The Licensee was out of compliance with R380-600-7(16)(a) by not reporting a critical incident to the Office within one business day. During a review of critical incidents, it was identified that the incident occurred on 03/08/2025. The provider became aware of the critical incident on 03/10/2025, but it was not reported until 03/14/2025.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2024-06-03","inspectionTypes":"Complaint, Investigation Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[{"ruleId":24729,"ruleNumber":"R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p)","ruleDescription":"Administrator Duties","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2024-06-25","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On 6/25/2024, the licensor verified that there had not been any allegations of suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation.  The Administrator stated that if there would have been he would have contacted Adult Protective Services, as stated by rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the licensee reported any suspected neglect to APS.  During the inspection, a resident was identified to have allegedly been left in soiled briefs and did not have them changed timely, resulting in skin breakdown on the lower back.  An investigation was completed by the facility, but APS was not notified of the alleged neglect.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false}],"dcount":0,"icount":0,"ccount":0,"specialties":null,"cmsCertNumber":null}