{"idNumber":"F23-97563","name":"Wasatch Crest Treatment Services-Highland (RT)","address":{"suggestedAddress":null,"id":null,"addressOne":"241 Highland Dr","addressTwo":"","city":"Park City","state":"UT","zipCode":"84098","county":null,"addressString":" 241 Highland Dr Park City, UT 84098","valid":true},"phone":"8017256642","type":null,"licenseType":"Residential Treatment","capacity":16,"underAgeTwoCapacity":null,"initialRegulationDate":"2023-02-24","expirationDate":"2027-02-28","conditional":false,"condExpirationDate":null,"status":"REGULATED","occQiReq":null,"licenseTypes":[{"name":"Residential Treatment","licenseExpirationDate":"2027-02-28","status":null,"totalCapacity":16,"underAgeTwoCapacity":null}],"inspections":[{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2026-07-08","inspectionTypes":"Follow-Up Inspection, Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2026-06-03","inspectionTypes":"Investigation Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2026-06-03","inspectionTypes":"Focus Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[{"ruleId":30994,"ruleNumber":"R501-14-3(1)","ruleDescription":"Ensure initial background screening submitted","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2026-07-08","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On July 27, 2026, the Licensor verified that the provider had developed and documented a method for supervising the employee, as required in rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The provider was out of compliance with R501-14-3(1) by not ensuring an applicant for initial background check completed the required disclosure statements for continual monitoring. During the inspection, one employee had not signed the required disclosure statements, resulting in their application being closed. After closure of the application, the employee continued to work for the provider.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2026-01-29","inspectionTypes":"Follow-Up Inspection","checklistIds":[855359],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2026-01-14","inspectionTypes":"Announced, Annual Inspection","checklistIds":[835140],"findings":[{"ruleId":30998,"ruleNumber":"R501-14-5(2)(a)-(b)","ruleDescription":"Application submitted within 2 weeks and applicant directly supervised","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2026-01-29","cmpAmount":1800.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On January 29, 2026, the licensor verified that the provider ensured all associated persons had applications submitted in the Direct Access Clearance System and anyone that required supervision had documented methods of supervision, as required in rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The provider was out of compliance with R501-14-5(2)(a),(b)(i-ii) by not submitting background check applications for each applicant for an initial background check no later than two weeks from the date the applicants became associated with the licensee, by not ensuring applicants were directly supervised until OBP (Office of Background Processing) issued a conditional or eligible clearance determination, and by not documenting how the applicants remained supervised for the entirety of the applicant's supervised employment terms before receiving clearance determinations. During the inspection, eight (8) employees were within their supervised employment terms and did not have documentation of how they would remain supervised. Additionally,  multiple employees were working unsupervised during their supervised employment terms, and [2] employees had been working multiple months and the provider representative had not submitted background check applications within 2 weeks of their hire and technical assistance was provided in the form of the licensor explaining that the aforementioned observation was a potential health and safety concern. Finally, one (1) employee was working unsupervised and background clearances had not been initiated.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2025-02-21","inspectionTypes":"Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2025-01-28","inspectionTypes":"Announced, Annual Inspection","checklistIds":[633656],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2024-02-14","inspectionTypes":"Announced, Annual Inspection","checklistIds":[580807],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false}],"dcount":0,"icount":0,"ccount":0,"specialties":"Substance Use Disorder, Mental Health, Adult Only","cmsCertNumber":null}