{"idNumber":"F23-98176","name":"Baymark Health Services of Utah, Inc.- Baart programs Salt Lake City","address":{"suggestedAddress":null,"id":null,"addressOne":"164 E 5900 S","addressTwo":"Suite 101","city":"Salt Lake City","state":"UT","zipCode":"84107","county":null,"addressString":" 164 E 5900 S Suite 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84107","valid":true},"phone":"4694704779","type":null,"licenseType":"Outpatient Treatment","capacity":null,"underAgeTwoCapacity":null,"initialRegulationDate":"2022-10-31","expirationDate":"2026-10-31","conditional":false,"condExpirationDate":null,"status":"REGULATED","occQiReq":null,"licenseTypes":[{"name":"Outpatient Treatment","licenseExpirationDate":"2026-10-31","status":null,"totalCapacity":null,"underAgeTwoCapacity":null}],"inspections":[{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2025-09-02","inspectionTypes":"Follow-Up Inspection, Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2025-08-27","inspectionTypes":"Announced, Annual Inspection","checklistIds":[666726],"findings":[{"ruleId":30998,"ruleNumber":"R501-14-5(2)(a)-(b)","ruleDescription":"Application submitted within 2 weeks and applicant directly supervised","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2025-09-02","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On September 2, 2025 the licensor verified that the provider entered the background check, fingerprints, and submitted a letter stating how the staff would be supervised until a conditional or eligible status is achieved, as stated in rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The provider was out of compliance with R501-14-5(2)(a)(b) by not entering a background check within two weeks of hire date and by not directly supervising employees until they have a conditional or eligible clearance status in the online system.  During the inspection, 1 employee hired 1.5 years ago did not have a background check entered into the online system.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2024-10-03","inspectionTypes":"Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2024-09-19","inspectionTypes":"Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[{"ruleId":25678,"ruleNumber":"R501-1-12(4)(a)-(c)","ruleDescription":"Required signed agreements","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"Low","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2024-10-03","cmpAmount":null,"warnCmpAmount":100.0,"correctionAction":"On 10/3/2024 the licensor verified that the provider had a complete signed consent for treatment that includes client rights and licensing contact information, as stated in rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not having a complete signed consent for treatment. During the inspection, the provider was missing complete client rights and licensing contact information. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2024-08-15","inspectionTypes":"Announced, Annual Inspection","checklistIds":[610751],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2024-04-10","inspectionTypes":"Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2024-03-12","inspectionTypes":"Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[{"ruleId":26502,"ruleNumber":"R501-21-5(2)(a)-(b)","ruleDescription":"Counselor to client ratio and practitioner visit requirements","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"Low","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2024-04-10","cmpAmount":0.0,"warnCmpAmount":100.0,"correctionAction":"On 4/10/2024 the licensor verified that the provider is now in compliance with ratios, as stated in rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not maintaining required ratios. At the time of the inspection, the provider had a program-wide counselor to consumer ratio of over 1:86. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2023-10-31","inspectionTypes":"Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false}],"dcount":0,"icount":0,"ccount":0,"specialties":null,"cmsCertNumber":null}