{"idNumber":"F23-99506","name":"Maple Mountain Recovery (Mapleton)","address":{"suggestedAddress":null,"id":null,"addressOne":"727 East 1100 South","addressTwo":null,"city":"Mapleton","state":"UT","zipCode":"84664","county":null,"addressString":" 727 East 1100 South Mapleton, UT 84664","valid":true},"phone":"8014279684","type":null,"licenseType":"Residential Treatment","capacity":16,"underAgeTwoCapacity":null,"initialRegulationDate":"2022-05-01","expirationDate":"2027-04-30","conditional":false,"condExpirationDate":null,"status":"REGULATED","occQiReq":null,"licenseTypes":[{"name":"Day Treatment","licenseExpirationDate":"2027-04-30","status":null,"totalCapacity":16,"underAgeTwoCapacity":null},{"name":"Residential Treatment","licenseExpirationDate":"2027-04-30","status":null,"totalCapacity":16,"underAgeTwoCapacity":null}],"inspections":[{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2026-04-16","inspectionTypes":"Follow-Up Inspection, Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2026-03-24","inspectionTypes":"Announced, Annual Inspection","checklistIds":[934711],"findings":[{"ruleId":30994,"ruleNumber":"R501-14-3(1)","ruleDescription":"Ensure initial background screening submitted","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2026-04-16","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"April 16, 2026, The licensor verified that all employees are in DACS and in compliance with background screening as stated in the rule. ","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The licensee was out of compliance with rule R501-14-3(1) for not ensuring that an applicant for an initial background check completes the required application fields and disclosure statements to authorize OBP's continual monitoring of the applicant. During the inspection, the licensor observed four employees in the Direct Access Clearance System (DACS) that were missing disclosure statements.","underAppeal":false},{"ruleId":30998,"ruleNumber":"R501-14-5(2)(a)-(b)","ruleDescription":"Application submitted within 2 weeks and applicant directly supervised","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2026-04-16","cmpAmount":400.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"April 16, 2026, The licensor verified that all employees are directly supervised and in compliance as stated in the rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The licensee was out of compliance with rule R501-14-5(2)(a)(b)(ii) for not completing the initial screening for two employees who did not have an eligible background screening in the Direct Access Clearance System (DACS) and for six other employees who required supervision. During the inspection, two employees employed longer than two weeks were not enrolled in DACS and required supervision along with six other eligible employees who also required supervision and did not have documentation for how the employee is to remain supervised. The provider did not provide supervision documentation for all eight employees requiring supervision. This is a repeat non-compliance on 3/27/2025.","underAppeal":false},{"ruleId":31001,"ruleNumber":"R501-14-5(5)(a)-(b)","ruleDescription":"Denied applicants may not direct access to clients","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2026-04-16","cmpAmount":500.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"March 24, 2026, The licensor verified with the licensee that S.T. is not longer employed and in compliance as stated in the rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The licensor was out of compliance with R501-14-5(5)(a) for one employee whose background clearance had been denied. During the inspection, the licensor observed that this employee was not-eligible in the Background Access Clearance System. This is a repeat non-compliance on 3/27/2025.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2025-06-12","inspectionTypes":"Investigation Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[{"ruleId":26137,"ruleNumber":"R380-80-5(4)","ruleDescription":"Provider shall protect clients from abuse, prevent abuse","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"MANAGER_APPROVAL","value":"Manager approval, no follow up needed","active":null},"correctionDate":"2025-06-12","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On 7/16/2025, the investigator observed through documentation that the staff was terminated on 6/9/2025 to ensure client rights are being observed going forward, as required by rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The provider is out of compliance with rule R380-80-5(4) by the provider failing to protect the client from any action that may compromise the health of the client. While reviewing documentation, the investigator observed that the staff admitted to law enforcement that they had administered ketamine, outside of treatment. This therapist is not certified to administer ketamine. The therapist admitted that this had happened at a hotel. Furthermore, the staff admitted to self harming in front of the client.","underAppeal":false},{"ruleId":26150,"ruleNumber":"R380-80-6(1)(a)-(i)","ruleDescription":"Client rights","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"MANAGER_APPROVAL","value":"Manager approval, no follow up needed","active":null},"correctionDate":"2025-06-12","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On 7/16/2025, the investigator observed through documentation that the staff was terminated on 6/9/2025 to ensure client rights are being observed going forward, as required by rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The provider is out of compliance with rule R380-80-6(1)(e) by the staff acting in a way that failed to keep the client free from exploitation. While reviewing documentation, the investigator observed in the police report that the staff admitted they had engaged in sexual conduct with the client during their time as the client’s therapist.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2025-04-29","inspectionTypes":"Follow-Up Inspection, Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2025-04-24","inspectionTypes":"Follow-Up Inspection","checklistIds":[648098],"findings":[{"ruleId":25716,"ruleNumber":"R501-1-16(2)(a)-(q)","ruleDescription":"Program policy and training","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"Low","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2025-04-29","cmpAmount":null,"warnCmpAmount":100.0,"correctionAction":"On April 29, 2025, the licensor verified that the Quality Assurance Director ensured that employees received training each year on the harassment and fire arms policies, as required by rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The Licensee was out of compliance with R501-1-16(2)(a),(h) by not ensuring that each employee completed required training each year.  During the inspection, two employees had not completed annual program policies for harassment training, and one employee had not completed firearms training each year. This was a repeat noncompliance as noted on 03/27/2025.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2025-03-27","inspectionTypes":"Announced, Annual Inspection","checklistIds":[643532],"findings":[{"ruleId":26573,"ruleNumber":"R501-14-5(2)(a)-(f)","ruleDescription":"Submitting application for an initial background screening","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2025-04-24","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On April 24, 2025, the licensor verified that the Quality Assurance Director ensured all employees who required direct access supervision, had documentation of the method of their supervision as required by rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The Licensee was out of compliance with R501-14-5(2)(b) by not documenting how individuals remained supervised for the entirety of their supervised employment term before receiving a clearance determination. During the inspection, one employee did not have an eligible clearance determination and there was no documentation of how the employee would remain supervised.","underAppeal":false},{"ruleId":26573,"ruleNumber":"R501-14-5(2)(a)-(f)","ruleDescription":"Submitting application for an initial background screening","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2025-04-24","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On April 24, 2025, the licensor verified that the Quality Assurance Director ensured all employees who required direct access supervision, had documentation of the method of their supervision as required by rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The Licensee was out of compliance with R501-14-5(2)(b) by not documenting how individuals remained supervised for the entirety of their supervised employment term before receiving a clearance determination. During the inspection, one employee did not have an eligible clearance determination and there was no documentation of how the employee would remain supervised.","underAppeal":false},{"ruleId":26573,"ruleNumber":"R501-14-5(2)(a)-(f)","ruleDescription":"Submitting application for an initial background screening","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2025-04-24","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On April 24, 2025, the licensor verified that the Quality Assurance Director ensured all employees who required direct access supervision, had documentation of the method of their supervision as required by rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The Licensee was out of compliance with R501-14-5(2)(b) by not documenting how individuals remained supervised for the entirety of their supervised employment term before receiving a clearance determination. During the inspection, one employee did not have an eligible clearance determination and there was no documentation of how the employee would remain supervised.","underAppeal":false},{"ruleId":26573,"ruleNumber":"R501-14-5(2)(a)-(f)","ruleDescription":"Submitting application for an initial background screening","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2025-04-24","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On April 24, 2025, the licensor verified that the Quality Assurance Director ensured all employees who required direct access supervision, had documentation of the method of their supervision as required by rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The Licensee was out of compliance with R501-14-5(2)(b) by not documenting how individuals remained supervised for the entirety of their supervised employment term before receiving a clearance determination. During the inspection, one employee did not have an eligible clearance determination and there was no documentation of how the employee would remain supervised.","underAppeal":false},{"ruleId":26573,"ruleNumber":"R501-14-5(2)(a)-(f)","ruleDescription":"Submitting application for an initial background screening","complaintDates":null,"findingCategory":"CITED","noncomplianceLevel":"High","correctionVerification":{"key":"VERIFIED","value":"Correction Verified","active":null},"correctionDate":"2025-04-24","cmpAmount":200.0,"warnCmpAmount":200.0,"correctionAction":"On April 24, 2025, the licensor verified that the Quality Assurance Director ensured all employees who required direct access supervision, had documentation of the method of their supervision as required by rule.","appealDate":null,"declarativeStatement":"The Licensee was out of compliance with R501-14-5(2)(b) by not documenting how individuals remained supervised for the entirety of their supervised employment term before receiving a clearance determination. During the inspection, one employee did not have an eligible clearance determination and there was no documentation of how the employee would remain supervised.","underAppeal":false}],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2024-04-30","inspectionTypes":"Non On-Site Inspection","checklistIds":[],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false},{"id":null,"inspectionDate":"2024-04-22","inspectionTypes":"Announced, Annual Inspection","checklistIds":[593400],"findings":[],"underAppeal":false}],"dcount":0,"icount":0,"ccount":0,"specialties":null,"cmsCertNumber":null}